Reader response
criticism focuses on reader’s response to literary texts. The reader's role in creating the meaning and experience of a
literary work, modern reader response criticism began in the 1960s and '70s,
particularly in America and Germany, in work by
Louis Rosenblatt , Wolfgang
Iser , Hans-Robert
Jauss , Roland
Barthes , and others. Reader-response theory recognizes the reader as an
active agent who imparts real existence to the work and completes its meaning
through interpretation. Reader-response criticism argues that literature should
be viewed as a performing art in which each reader creates his or her own,
possibly unique, text-related performance.
The term “horizon of expectation” used to
describe the criteria readers use to judge literary texts in any given period.
These criteria will help the reader decide hoe to judge a poem as, foe example,
an epic or a tragedy or a pastoral; it will also, in a more general way, cover
what is to be regarded as poetic or literary as opposed to unpoetic or non
literary uses of languages. Ordinary writing and reading will work within such
a horizon.
The original horizon of expectation
only tells us how the work was valued and interpreted when it appeared, but
does not establish its meaning finally.
In Jauss’s (in Selder
Raman, 1993: 53) view, it would be equally wrong to say that a work is
universal, that its meaning is fixed forever and open to all readers in any
period: “ A literary works is not an object which stands by itself and which
offers the same face to each reader in each period. It is no a monument which
reveals its timeless essence in a monologue
In other words, Jauss
believes that there is no fixed meaning in a literary work. The meaning always
develops and changes by the time. The readers in a given time have different
interpretations with the readers in other period. Therefore, there will be no
final meaning from a literary work.
In Reader Response “
horizon of expectation” by Hans Robert Jauss, uses the term horizon to
expectation to describe the criteria readers use to judge literary texts in any
given period. We can conclude:
Literary Works + Reader = Interpretation
(Expectation) Value
Meaningful life
The reader must have education,
knowledge and experience. Its means reader response critics the reader’s
expectation of the literary works not the literary works directly.
Literary Works + Reader =
Criticism + Researcher = Reader Response critics
Comments
Response
So, The Horizon the Expectation is
the expectation about literary work that brought by the reader based on
education, knowledge and experience with complete the researcher analysis and
it complete of the literary works
source: berbagai sumber
No comments:
Post a Comment